Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific ; 30:100645, 2023.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-2122682

ABSTRACT

Summary Background Hong Kong followed a strict COVID-19 elimination strategy in 2020. We estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic responses on all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations and deaths in 2020. Methods Interrupted time-series analysis using negative binomial regression accounting for seasonality and long-term trend was used on weekly 2010–2020 data to estimate the change in hospitalization risk and excess mortality occurring both within and out of hospitals. Findings In 2020, as compared to a 2010–2019 baseline, we observed an overall reduction in all-cause hospitalizations, and a concurrent increase in deaths. The overall hospitalization reduction (per 100,000 population) was 4809 (95% CI: 4692, 4926) in 2020, with respiratory diseases (632, 95% CI: 607, 658) and cardiovascular diseases (275, 95% CI: 264, 286) contributing most. The overall excess mortality (per 100,000 population) was 25 (95% CI: 23, 27) in 2020, mostly among individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases (12, 95% CI: 11, 13). A reduction in excess in-hospital mortality (−10 per 100,000, 95% CI: −12, −8) was accompanied by an increase in excess out-of-hospital mortality (32, 95% CI: 29, 34). Interpretation The COVID-19 pandemic might have caused indirect impact on population morbidity and mortality likely through changed healthcare seeking particularly in youngest and oldest individuals and those with cardiovascular diseases. Better healthcare planning is needed during public health emergencies with disruptions in healthcare services. Funding Health and Medical Research Fund, Collaborative Research Fund, AIR@InnoHK and RGC Senior Research Fellow Scheme, Hong Kong.

2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 126: 132-135, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2086293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the transmission dynamics of the Omicron BA.1.1 variant in an outbreak in China. METHODS: We constructed 113 transmission pairs based on the time of exposure and symptom onset for identified infectors and infectees, using the epidemiological data collected during an outbreak in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China, between January and February 2022. The key epidemiological parameters were estimated. RESULTS: The mean estimates of the incubation period and latent period distributions were 3.8 days (95% credible interval: 3.5, 4.1) and 3.1 days (2.8, 3.5), respectively. The overall transmission risk peaked at symptom onset, and we estimated that 33.6% (24.8, 42.5) of transmission occurred before symptom onset. The forward generation time decreased from 5.2 days (4.7, 5.7) at the start of the outbreak to 2.2 days (2.0, 2.5) by the end. Allowing this variation over time in the generation time distribution, we estimated that the reproduction number dropped rapidly from 9.5 (3.5, 18.4) to 0.8 (0.3, 1.5) over the outbreak. CONCLUSION: Shorter incubation period and latent period were estimated for the Omicron BA.1.1 variant. Stringent public health measures prevented a large epidemic by reducing transmission, as indicated by the shortened generation time.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , China/epidemiology
3.
Euro Surveill ; 27(10)2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742166

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 had become predominant globally by November 2021.AimWe evaluated transmission dynamics and epidemiological characteristics of the Delta variant in an outbreak in southern China.MethodsData on confirmed COVID-19 cases and their close contacts were retrospectively collected from the outbreak that occurred in Guangdong, China in May and June 2021. Key epidemiological parameters, temporal trend of viral loads and secondary attack rates were estimated. We also evaluated the association of vaccination with viral load and transmission.ResultsWe identified 167 patients infected with the Delta variant in the Guangdong outbreak. Mean estimates of latent and incubation period were 3.9 days and 5.8 days, respectively. Relatively higher viral load was observed in infections with Delta than in infections with wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Secondary attack rate among close contacts of cases with Delta was 1.4%, and 73.1% (95% credible interval (CrI): 32.9-91.4) of the transmissions occurred before onset. Index cases without vaccination (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.84; 95% CI: 1.19-8.45) or with an incomplete vaccination series (aOR: 6.02; 95% CI: 2.45-18.16) were more likely to transmit infection to their contacts than those who had received the complete primary vaccination series.DiscussionPatients infected with the Delta variant had more rapid symptom onset compared with the wild type. The time-varying serial interval should be accounted for in estimation of reproduction numbers. The higher viral load and higher risk of pre-symptomatic transmission indicated the challenges in control of infections with the Delta variant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(12): 2344-2352, 2021 12 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1599313

ABSTRACT

Incubation period is an important parameter to inform quarantine period and to study transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on published estimates of the incubation period distribution of coronavirus disease 2019, and showed that the pooled median of the point estimates of the mean, median and 95th percentile for incubation period are 6.3 days (range, 1.8-11.9 days), 5.4 days (range, 2.0-17.9 days), and 13.1 days (range, 3.2-17.8 days), respectively. Estimates of the mean and 95th percentile of the incubation period distribution were considerably shorter before the epidemic peak in China compared to after the peak, and variation was also noticed for different choices of methodological approach in estimation. Our findings implied that corrections may be needed before directly applying estimates of incubation period into control of or further studies on emerging infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases, Emerging , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Humans , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(9): 1678-1681, 2022 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376289

ABSTRACT

Using detailed exposure information on COVID-19 cases, we estimated the mean latent period to be 5.5 (95% CI: 5.1-5.9) days, shorter than the mean incubation period (6.9 days). Laboratory testing may allow shorter quarantines since 95% of COVID-19 cases shed virus within 10.6 (95% CI: 9.6-11.6) days of infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2
6.
China CDC Wkly ; 2(34): 655-657, 2020 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1355402
8.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 68(2): 782-788, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-657344

ABSTRACT

Tracing and isolation of close contacts is used to control outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. However, risk factors associated with the occurrence of COVID-19 among close contacts have not been well described. A total of 106 household contacts were included in this study, of whom 19 developed into COVID-19 cases, and the secondary attack rate was 17.9%. Multivariable analysis showed that increasing risk of occurrence of COVID-19 among household contacts was associated with female index patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 3.84, 95% CI = 1.07-13.78), critical disease index patients (aHR = 7.58, 95% CI = 1.66-34.66), effective contact duration with index patients > 2 days (aHR = 4.21, 95% CI = 1.29-13.73), and effective contact duration > 11 days (aHR = 17.88, 95% CI = 3.26-98.01). The sex and disease severity of index patients with COVID-19 and longer effective contact duration with patients with confirmed COVID-19 could help epidemiologists to identify potential COVID-19 cases among household contacts at an early stage.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Family Characteristics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/transmission , China/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Contact Tracing , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL